I'm excited to announce that thejdm is now updated to the latest phpbb 3.2 software. You may notice the site is now mobile friendly but with the upgrade comes some hiccups. theGarage, theGallery, theArcade are no longer supported. In due time the developers should be working to release the modifications to work on the new software. #LetsMakeForumsGreatAgain
post reviews of good & bad sellers & shops.
Forum rules
1. individual user feedback is listed in the users personal profile under feedback.
2. you can view a list of good and bad sellers on the feedback main page here:
main feedback page
3. please remember to leave feedback for a member you have done a transaction with.
-
nonJDMdsm
- 60% ricer
- Posts: 360
- Joined: November 10, 2003
-
Contact:
Post
by nonJDMdsm » May 06, 2004
kotomile wrote:nonJDMdsm wrote: i know jealousy is a bitch and all but dont go around bashing the shop just because u had to wait for a part,its the beginning of the race season,parts are gettin harder and harder to get ahold of.
What of the lies and the outlandish "restocking" fee for a part that never was stocked in the first place?
a restocking fee for a part that isnt stock is usually charged because u CANNOT send parts back to the vendor without them wacking u a restocking fee.plus not to mention paying shipping to send it back.
and the lies,well i cant explain those,i dunno how they handle things there but i assure u mike wouldnt stand for it if he knew this is goin on.
-
kotomile
- 95% JDM
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: November 20, 2003
- Location: Afghanistan
-
Contact:
Post
by kotomile » May 06, 2004
a restocking fee for a part that isnt stock is usually charged because u CANNOT send parts back to the vendor without them wacking u a restocking fee.plus not to mention paying shipping to send it back.
So, I asked them again nicely to refund in full my purchase and they refused, and said they would HAVE to charge me a 10% restocking fee ($60!!) "to cover their asses with ACT". Now when I called ACT today, I asked the woman about this fee and she told me that ACT does NOT charge their sellers to cancel an order for a backordered item, so that was LIE #2!
-
nonJDMdsm
- 60% ricer
- Posts: 360
- Joined: November 10, 2003
-
Contact:
Post
by nonJDMdsm » May 06, 2004
So, I asked them again nicely to refund in full my purchase and they refused, and said they would HAVE to charge me a 10% restocking fee ($60!!) "to cover their asses with ACT". Now when I called ACT today, I asked the woman about this fee and she told me that ACT does NOT charge their sellers to cancel an order for a backordered item, so that was LIE #2!
[/quote]
ok..read that u just quoted..."ACT does NOT charge sellers to CANCEL AN ORDER FOR A BACKORDERED ITEM!!!!!!" thus meaning if the product is on backorder,u can simply call them up and cancel it B4 u get the product.but once the product has been shipped and u received it,u cannot return it to them without being charged a restocking fee.....
anything else?
-
ADAMnQuickCIVIC
- 100% ricer
- Posts: 17
- Joined: December 06, 2003
- Location: NJ
-
Contact:
Post
by ADAMnQuickCIVIC » May 06, 2004
nonJDMdsm wrote:So, I asked them again nicely to refund in full my purchase and they refused, and said they would HAVE to charge me a 10% restocking fee ($60!!) "to cover their asses with ACT". Now when I called ACT today, I asked the woman about this fee and she told me that ACT does NOT charge their sellers to cancel an order for a backordered item, so that was LIE #2!
ok..read that u just quoted..."ACT does NOT charge sellers to CANCEL AN ORDER FOR A BACKORDERED ITEM!!!!!!" thus meaning if the product is on backorder,u can simply call them up and cancel it B4 u get the product.but once the product has been shipped and u received it,u cannot return it to them without being charged a restocking fee.....
anything else?[/quote]
EXACTLY MY POINT...the part IS still on backorder!
So why were they trying to charge me a re-stocking fee?!?!
It's not costing them a dime to cancel the order.
-
turbotalon91
- 100% ricer
- Posts: 4
- Joined: November 28, 2003
Post
by turbotalon91 » September 21, 2004
i've delt with slow boy several times got all my internals their and never had a problem
-
spnfedeg6
- 65% ricer
- Posts: 318
- Joined: September 19, 2004
- Location: pittsburgh
Post
by spnfedeg6 » August 07, 2006
Ive heard some terrible shit about slow boy too. I would never go there for anything.
-
trbobrk
- 95% ricer
- Posts: 50
- Joined: February 28, 2005
- Location: Seattle, WA
Post
by trbobrk » August 09, 2006
Yeah they suck. Bought a few new subaru engines from them, Way overpriced and way late getting here. First one had funky compression and blew up after 10 hour s, second one also had problems but we were able to put the heads on a new shortblock and get it it run. Don't know about the 3rd one yet, it's sitting on the shelf till we have some spare time to fiddle with it.
-
tommybanzai
- 25% ricer
- Posts: 639
- Joined: June 29, 2003
- Location: Ill Ass J-town
-
Contact:
Post
by tommybanzai » August 09, 2006
sometimes this is the shit some people have to deal with if they wanna whore numbers around between companies and get the cheapest price they can get...something for nothing is what everyone wants anymore....sucks to be the original poster on here though in this topic. And it won't be the last time you run into this type of problem.
the new and slightly improved...don't piss me off, and i won't f#*k with you!!! *gggrrrr*
-
sikblugsx
- 75% ricer
- Posts: 222
- Joined: October 08, 2005
Post
by sikblugsx » August 17, 2006
I kinda like sbr and for the guy with the subarus what did you do to them for ten hours?
-
trbobrk
- 95% ricer
- Posts: 50
- Joined: February 28, 2005
- Location: Seattle, WA
Post
by trbobrk » August 20, 2006
It was on a dyno, being broken in at low speeds to get some time on it before we started messing around with it.